Co-authored-by: wilba <wilba@wilba.tech>
Co-authored-by: Pablo Martínez <58857054+elpekenin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joel Challis <git@zvecr.com>
Co-authored-by: Nick Brassel <nick@tzarc.org>
* Add macros to extract parameters from keycode values
Implement both encoding and decoding for keycodes like TO(layer) or
LM(layer, mod) in one place, so that the decoding won't get out of sync
with the encoding.
While at it, fix some macros for creating keycode values that did not
apply the appropriate masks to parameters (and therefore could allow the
result to be out of range if a wrong parameter was passed).
* keymap_common: Use extraction macros for keycodes
* pointing_device_auto_mouse: Use extraction macros for keycodes
Fixes#18970.
* process_autocorrect: Use extraction macros for keycodes
* process_caps_word: Use extraction macros for keycodes
(Also fix a minor bug - SH_TG was not handled properly)
* process_leader: Use extraction macros for keycodes
(Technically the code is not 100% correct, because it always assumes
that the LT() or MT() action was a tap, but it's a separate issue that
already existed before the keycode changes.)
* process_unicode: Use extraction macros for keycodes
* process_unicodemap: Use extraction macros for keycodes
* Deprecate SECURE_* keycodes for QK_SECURE_*
* Update keycode process
* Update process_secure.c
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan <fauxpark@gmail.com>
* Add ARRAY_SIZE and CEILING utility macros
* Apply a coccinelle patch to use ARRAY_SIZE
* fix up some straggling items
* Fix 'make test:secure'
* Enhance ARRAY_SIZE macro to reject acting on pointers
The previous definition would not produce a diagnostic for
```
int *p;
size_t num_elem = ARRAY_SIZE(p)
```
but the new one will.
* explicitly get definition of ARRAY_SIZE
* Convert to ARRAY_SIZE when const is involved
The following spatch finds additional instances where the array is
const and the division is by the size of the type, not the size of
the first element:
```
@ rule5a using "empty.iso" @
type T;
const T[] E;
@@
- (sizeof(E)/sizeof(T))
+ ARRAY_SIZE(E)
@ rule6a using "empty.iso" @
type T;
const T[] E;
@@
- sizeof(E)/sizeof(T)
+ ARRAY_SIZE(E)
```
* New instances of ARRAY_SIZE added since initial spatch run
* Use `ARRAY_SIZE` in docs (found by grep)
* Manually use ARRAY_SIZE
hs_set is expected to be the same size as uint16_t, though it's made
of two 8-bit integers
* Just like char, sizeof(uint8_t) is guaranteed to be 1
This is at least true on any plausible system where qmk is actually used.
Per my understanding it's universally true, assuming that uint8_t exists:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48655310/can-i-assume-that-sizeofuint8-t-1
* Run qmk-format on core C files touched in this branch
Co-authored-by: Stefan Kerkmann <karlk90@pm.me>
* Fix Caps Word to treat mod-taps more consistently.
Previously, holding any mod-tap key while Caps Word is active stops Caps
Word, and this happens regardless of `caps_word_press_user()`. Yet for
regular mod keys, AltGr (KC_RALT) is ignored, Shift keys are passed to
`caps_word_press_user()` to determine whether to continue, and
similarly, a key `RSFT(KC_RALT)` representing Right Shift + Alt is
passed to `caps_word_press_user()` to determine whether to continue.
This commit makes held mod-tap keys consistent with regular mod keys:
* Holding a `RALT_T` mod-tap is ignored.
* When holding a shift mod-tap key, `KC_LSFT` or `KC_RSFT` is passed to
`caps_word_press_user()` to determine whether to continue.
* When holding a Right Shift + Alt (`RSA_T`) mod-tap, `RSFT(KC_RALT)` is
passed to `caps_word_press_user()`.
Particularly, with this fix a user may choose to continue Caps Word when
a shift mod-tap key is held by adding `KC_LSFT` and `KC_RSFT` cases in
`caps_word_press_user()`. For instance as
```
bool caps_word_press_user(uint16_t keycode) {
switch (keycode) {
// Keycodes that continue Caps Word, with shift applied.
case KC_A ... KC_Z:
case KC_MINS:
add_weak_mods(MOD_BIT(KC_LSFT)); // Apply shift to the next key.
return true;
// Keycodes that continue Caps Word, without shifting.
case KC_1 ... KC_0:
case KC_BSPC:
case KC_DEL:
case KC_UNDS:
case KC_LSFT: // <<< Added here.
case KC_RSFT:
return true;
default:
return false; // Deactivate Caps Word.
}
}
```
* Fix Caps Word to treat mod-taps more consistently.
Previously, holding any mod-tap key while Caps Word is active stops Caps
Word, and this happens regardless of `caps_word_press_user()`. Yet for
regular mod keys, AltGr (KC_RALT) is ignored, Shift keys are passed to
`caps_word_press_user()` to determine whether to continue, and
similarly, a key `RSFT(KC_RALT)` representing Right Shift + Alt is
passed to `caps_word_press_user()` to determine whether to continue.
This commit makes held mod-tap keys consistent with regular mod keys:
* Holding a `RALT_T` mod-tap is ignored.
* When holding a shift mod-tap key, `KC_LSFT` or `KC_RSFT` is passed to
`caps_word_press_user()` to determine whether to continue.
* When holding a Right Shift + Alt (`RSA_T`) mod-tap, `RSFT(KC_RALT)` is
passed to `caps_word_press_user()`.
Particularly, with this fix a user may choose to continue Caps Word when
a shift mod-tap key is held by adding `KC_LSFT` and `KC_RSFT` cases in
`caps_word_press_user()`. For instance as
```
bool caps_word_press_user(uint16_t keycode) {
switch (keycode) {
// Keycodes that continue Caps Word, with shift applied.
case KC_A ... KC_Z:
case KC_MINS:
add_weak_mods(MOD_BIT(KC_LSFT)); // Apply shift to the next key.
return true;
// Keycodes that continue Caps Word, without shifting.
case KC_1 ... KC_0:
case KC_BSPC:
case KC_DEL:
case KC_UNDS:
case KC_LSFT: // <<< Added here.
case KC_RSFT:
return true;
default:
return false; // Deactivate Caps Word.
}
}
```
* Update quantum/process_keycode/process_caps_word.c
Co-authored-by: Joel Challis <git@zvecr.com>
Drashna Jaelre
Joel Challis
Ryan
Stefan Kerkmann
precondition
Sergey Vlasov
Nick Brassel
Selene ToyKeeper
Jason Ken Adhinarta
QMK Bot
Joshua Diamond
Jeff Epler
Pascal Getreuer
Chewxy